Show the current structure and the proposed structure separately, with the conditions and evidence for each. Do not present a forecast as existing ownership.
Use effective dates throughout the corporate record
Include the agreement, approvals obtained, outstanding conditions and anticipated closing steps. Identify which entity would petition and employ the applicant under the proposed arrangement. Ask how the stage affects filing evidence. Preserve later closing documents when available rather than replacing an earlier proposed chart without explanation.
The core record set is usually an ownership chart backed by formation and share documents, foreign payroll and role evidence, and a detailed U.S. position description. Add proof that both organizations are actively doing business and identify every intermediate holding entity. The first review often exposes one missing register or an organizational chart that skips a shareholder. Hypothetical example: a geothermal drilling group employs its regional manager through a Canadian parent, while the U.S. petitioner is held by a different subsidiary. Obtain registers and control documents for each link, then map the manager’s foreign reporting line and proposed U.S. authority. Do not rely on a logo, common website, or unsigned chart. The decision is whether the file proves the relationship and the worker’s qualifying history with documents that existed before the petition, not explanations prepared after questions arise.