TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a Hanwell household is looking at three different U.S. possibilities in the same year. One partner is a land-use planner with an offer from a county planning agency across the border, a neighbour who owns a modular-home plant has been asked to run a small U.S. assembly subsidiary, and a couple who sell building materials want to buy a lumber yard in a rural U.S. county. None of those three questions has the same answer, and none of them is settled by how good the plan sounds when it is described out loud.
The six routes described here are TN professional entry, L-1A managerial or executive transfer, L-1B specialized-knowledge transfer, E-2 treaty investment, EB-5 immigrant investment and the official Gold Card process. United States immigration law is federal, and it is applied to an applicant from a rural community west of a provincial capital exactly as it is applied anywhere else in Canada. What changes from household to household is never the rule; it is the evidence. Which credential exists, who owns which company, where the money currently sits and whose name is on it are the facts that decide files. Read the six summaries below and work out which rule your own facts would meet first, and which one they would fail.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
The appendix names a specific credential for each profession, and an adjacent qualification does not substitute for it.

Some refusals turn on something that could have been checked early. A profession named in the USMCA appendix carries its own qualification test, so the credential must be assessed against the exact text of that listing. A company transfer needs a corporate relationship that exists on paper on the day of filing, not one that is planned for the spring. An investment must be committed and at risk, which a healthy bank balance never demonstrates on its own. Immigrant investment turns on the lawful source and the traceable path of the money, item by item and account by account. Before anyone books travel, signs an offer or pays a retainer, write down the single condition that would sink the case and find out whether you satisfy it.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
Before collecting anything, find the actual eligibility wording for the route you are considering and copy it out. A plan built only on a summary can miss a condition that the governing rule requires.
Take the credential, share register, purchase agreement or bank record you are relying on and ask whether it satisfies that wording as written. If it only nearly does, treat the case as not yet ready to file.
Where a required fact is missing, decide what would create it: a licence application, a share issuance, an amended offer letter, a valuation. Do that work before anyone commits to a start date or gives notice.
Assemble the record a reviewer works through: threshold proof first, then the surrounding evidence that explains it, then each family member's own citizenship, age and intended activity.
Hypothetical example: a household has a salaried position, a trade or a woodlot on the side, and a spouse's business run from the kitchen table. That mix is not a problem, but it does mean the records live in several places. Payroll sits with one entity and invoices with another, equipment is titled personally, and an incorporation has been dormant since a reorganization nobody wrote down. Gather those items now, in the form they actually exist, and let the immigration file describe the household truthfully. A tidy account that the tax filings contradict costs far more to repair than an untidy one that they support.
Find your pathwayShneur Herman, Jo Kubti and Alexander Paton review files remotely. There is no office to visit and no local appointment to book; documents are read as they are sent, and questions are answered against the wording of the rule rather than against what similar cases usually look like. Expect to be asked twice for anything that arrives incomplete, and expect a direct answer when a plan will not work as described. Where an accountant or a corporate lawyer is already involved, the same records should reach everyone, so that nobody builds a schedule on a fact that is still unproven.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
No. Every condition described here is set by United States federal law and applies identically across Canada. What differs from file to file is record-keeping: ownership, payroll and operating records may have to be assembled from several sources.
No. Consultations and file review are remote, and documents are exchanged electronically. That also means a first conversation can happen before anything has been gathered, which is usually the cheapest point at which to learn what a case really turns on.
Not necessarily. Each listed profession carries its own degree, licence or experience requirement, and the officer compares the document in front of them with that wording. For the Urban Planner (including Geographer) listing, the stated minimum is a baccalaureate or licenciatura degree; it does not name a field of study. Check the listing before an employer sets a start date.
After the immigration structure is settled, not before. Where the proceeds sit, whose name they are in and how each step was documented all become evidence later, and a transfer made for convenience can be very hard to explain a year afterwards.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.